|
Members Present: Chairman Brian Boyers, Bette White, Leo Lessard, Bob
Bourdeau and Dan Steinbach, Larry Brown, Bob Graham, Lisa Rhys
Absent Members: Mike Smith and Mike McDonnell
Others Present: Mark Phillips, Hank Soucy, Chris Berry, David Mott, Tom
Gray, Jim Mummey, Ed Ryan, Don Anderson, Chris Anderson, Time Molinero, and
Ellen Hilton.
Meeting Called to Order by Brian Boyers 6:30PM
1. Public Input.
Chair opened the Public Input
Chair closed Public Input
2. Approval of the December 18th 2007 Minutes.
The minutes should read Bob Bourdeau and Dan Steinbach were excused from the
December 18th, 2008 meeting not absent.
Leo Lessard made a motion to accept the minutes of December 18th, 2008.
Seconded by Dan Steinbach;
Vote 4 Yes - 1 Sustained by Bob Bourdeau
The Chairman appointed Bob Graham to be seated for Vice
Chairman Larry Brown
3. Discussion Re: New Yankee Homes for a continuance of precedent
conditions; property located on Jug Hill Road (Tax Map 4, Lot 7) in Milton,
NH.
Bob Bourdeau stated he would be against any further continuance of New
Yankee Homes. There have been numerous continuances and the continuous go to
the problem they have not done their work in a timely fashion. Bette White
agrees with B. Bourdeau we have check after the meeting that we had given a
continuance and they still had not filed any paperwork requested. The
applicant had asked for a continuance and was not at the last meeting when
they were on the agenda.
Dan Steinbach requested a quick review from the Chair because D. Steinbach
was not at the last Planning Board Meeting.
Bette White stated there was nothing at the meeting (12-18th-07) as there
was no one there to represent New Yankee Home.
The Chair indicated this goes back to the expiration of the subdivision in
September 2006 and first came to the Boards attention on November 6th, 2007
and at that time asked for a continuance, and here it is January 2008, with
no new information or contact.
Chris Berry stated the reason for tonight's continuance and he apologized,
but he was not told that New Yankee Home was put on the agenda, unless C.
Berry receive notification he does not know when he on agendas, this is why
he is unprepared to represent New Yankee Home at this meeting, C. Berry
apologized for missing the previous meetings to discuss this matter, that it
might be the responsibility of us, the applicant. After our initial meeting
with the board C. Berry did find all the documentation that the Board had
requested. C. Berry indicated there was a 6-8 month period where the
applicant did not do anything with the project and it was not the fault of
DES or anyone else. There was about a 6-8 months period of time that we did
not do anything on the project again per the applicant's request and as you
all know it is probably do to the market conditions. C. Berry requested one
more continuance so that he can provide the Board with the information and
make the applicant aware the Board is about to make the decision on the
application and all parties be present when that happens. C. Berry indicated
he is not asking for any decision for New Yankees Homes, but asked not to
make any judgment against New Yankee Home without the applicant present.
The Chair B. Boyer stated that when C. Berry left the last Meeting (November
2007), he indicated he would have all the information for the Board at the
next meeting, C. Berry agreed. The Chair indicated that the Board has not
received any information to date and it is January 2008, C Berry agreed.
Leo Lessard asked C. Berry if he was notified by the Board about this
pending issue. C. Berry indicated he was not.
Bob Bourdeau stated that Chris Berry was present when the Board made the
motion for a continuance.
Bette White referred to the November Minutes of the Planning Board, Dan
Steinbach made a motion to continue and the Board requested documentation. B
White indicated the Board still has not received any documentation and it is
now January 2008. The Chair agreed and C. Berry agreed.
Dan Steinbach asked Chris Berry if part of the reason he was not prepared to
represent New Yankee Homes at this time was because he did not get a copy of
the agenda or you did know you were on the agenda and just not prepared to
more forward at this point.
Chris Berry indicated he was unaware he was on tonight's agenda and that why
he is unprepared for the meeting. C. Berry said he does have the
information, if he was aware of being on the agenda he would have
brought it to the meeting and if the Board was to make a judgment it is
certain with the Board right, C. Berry said he was disputing that, the fact
the applicant hasn't made any contact with the Board since the initial
presentation and now. Mr. Berry stated he was here tonight for another
client's application.
Dan Steinbach asked if it was the intention of the applicant to start
building or not, the market conditions are still down.
Chris Berry states without the applicant present in his opinion most likely
not.
B. White reviewed the discussion at November's meeting regarding New Yankee
Homes and your concerns of not being on the September 2007 agenda, after you
had requested it. B. White indicated that was November, it now January 2008
and the still has received any documentation.
B. Bourdeau stated that in November there was some consensus of the Board
that it should even grant continuance and there was consensus also with a
few members of the Board to hear them out. We gave them every option to hear
them out back in November 2007. Here it is continue, continue, continue, and
feels the Board has gone above and beyond, it is now gotten out of hand.
B. White explained to C. Berry he did not have to be on an agenda to furnish
the Board with the needed documentation, he could leave paperwork at the
Town Office.
C. Berry brought up the discussion he verbally requested in late summer,
early fall to be place on the agenda, he contested the fact there is no
record of it. C. Berry understands it is separate from the issue that the
Board hadn’t heard from the applicant since November.
Dan Steinbach commented on the frustration of the Board, and noted that the
economy is bad for housing development and does not see where we are going
to do any damage to the Town by continuing this. D. Steinbach see no problem
with people making money building houses, he would like to see people who
put houses together working and so it is his feelings that if someone is
able to build a house in this current economy the Board should consider it
very seriously no matter how we feel about granting the continuance.
The Chair reads from the November 20th minutes. The Chairman received a
letter from C.
Berry dated November 20th, 2007 requesting a continuance do to his work
load. Dan Steinbach made the motion to continue discussion until December
18th, Leo Lessard seconded. B. White noted that the Board had requested
documentation and questioned why the Board is continuing the discussion.
Chair stated C. Berry has supposed to be at December 18th, 2007 meeting.
B. White state she understands D. Steinbach view, but the Board has a set of
rules and regulations that everyone abides by on every application that
comes in and you have a year to do certain approvals and conditions of
approval. The Board did not get the information it needed, the applicant was
given a break and continued the application and we still didn't get.
Leo Lessard stated his question about being notified was really a much
broader question. If the Board decides to review something at the next
meeting, do we notify the applicant? Do they find out from the paper or
inquire themselves? Is it the obligation of the Board to notify the
applicant? The Chair indicated it was not, as the Board post the agenda.
Hank Soucy informed the Board that there was three houses done and one there
is one that still has not sold. Chair acknowledges that was the first part
of the subdivision.
Dan Steinbach moved to continue this to the next meeting, Chair ask for
second, there was no second, motion denied.
B. Bourdeau made a motion to deny any further continuances for the New
Yankees Homes
B. White second the motion.
D. Steinbach asked if this prohibits them from coming back. The Chair
indicated it would need to be a completely new application and abide by the
current Zoning Regulations.
Vote: 4-Yes, 1-No by Dan Steinbach
4. Discussion Re: Shortridge Academy, LLC. For property located on
619 Governors Rd., Milton, NH (Map 25 Lot 2) The Planning Board
approved the Minor Site Plan Application on September 19th, 2006.
The Chair questioned if they had an Occupancy Permit, and did they apply
with the ZBA for the height restriction.
Hank Soucy, Building Inspector indicated that they do have an Occupancy
Permit and questions how this got generated because when it was initially
built that was one of the questions that he purposed to the engineer and it
was not supposed to succeed 35 feet, it was 33 ½ feet, so he is not sure
where this height restriction is coming in.
The Chair questioned if it had been documented it was over 35 feet. H. Soucy
stated according to the plans, no it is not over 35 feet.
The Chair requested a copy of the Occupancy Permit from H. Soucy for the
next meeting.
Bette White requested the LUC to provide the documents from the Assessing
Clerk for the Planning Board Meeting.
Discussion of the Applicant is continued to the next meeting on February
5th, 2008 at 6:30PM.
5. Discussion Re: Aerial NDT Inspection, Inc. Industrial Drive,
Milton (Map 18 Lot 10.6) Final Approval
Chair stated at the last meeting that was an agreement with the owners they
would supply a bond with the Selectmen for the drainage study which had not
been done; this was part of posting a bond so a Certificate of Occupancy
could be issued.
C. Berry indicated he was representing Aerial NDT and was just brought into
the project and unsure exactly what the Board needed. It was C. Berry's
understanding the condition of approval as it had been presented to him,
was that the Planning Board had given approved of the Site Plan pending a
Storm Water/Erosion Control Plan Report and didn't seems to know exactly
what that report was. Rather or not the Board wanted a Drainage Analyzes, an
over all Storm Water Plan, or a plan similar to what the EPA requires such
as the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. C. Berry is here tonight to
pin down exactly what the Board wants. C. Berry indicated he does have
copies of the former Crown Point Survey and Mott Site Plan, which he
could present to the Board. C. Berry also informed the Board he has a copy
of the SWPPP and four full size copies of the Storm water Pollution
Prevention Sediment Erosion Control Plan. C. Berry felt this is what the
Board was requesting from the applicant.
The Chair indicated that item #9 on the Notice of Planning Board Decision
dated November 30, 2006 read: (9. There shall be an approved Stormwater
Erosion Control report before a plan is signed.) The Chair asked who
wanted to approved this project.
B. Boudeau said this is usually done by a 3rd Party Review. D. Mott stated
he may be able to add a little history to enlighten the Board with some
information, when it was brought to his intention that the approval was
going to run out in November 2007 he did attend the Planning Board Meeting.
The Board requested to address all the condition except for the Erosion
Control and Drainage Report. D. Mott asked exactly what the Board wanted,
and the Board referred it back to D Mott for his opinion and the necessity
of a Drainage Report for a project of this size
B. Bourdeau stated when Chris Jacobs presented this project, the Board had
made several adjustments and gave up buffers because of the importance of
the swale and in C. Jacobs's presentation he indicated it was critical. B
Boudeau stated, he disagrees to say we do not
need this now.
C. Berry stated he didn't want any confusion, C. Berry doesn't believe Mr.
Jacobs the former Crown Point Survey did a drainage analysis which is
normally done for approval and C. Berry stated he is not presenting he has
done an analysis either.
C. Berry expressed his concerns with the current path the Board is seeking,
that the plans have been conditionally approved, the building is already
been built and most of the site has been done. C. Berry is concerned if this
goes for a 3rd Party Review it would be reviewed as a new application and C.
Berry stated he can do a drainage analyzes but he guarantees the analyzes
will generate an increase in storm water run off, which is contrary to the
site plan approval and the site plan has already been approved. C. Berry
stated he would not propose to design or build any detention basin after an
approval and after construction. C. Berry indicated this is where he is
confused on the current situation.
B. Bourdeau stated his interpretation of the situation; a building permit
was issued before the plan being signed and started construction of the
building hence the problem the Board is in now. B. Bourdeau believes it is
the duty of the Board to make sure the site is being built out as it was
presented to the Board in the initial approval, regardless if he has built a
building, regardless if he got a permit ahead of time. Obviously a mistake
was made and the Board is trying to take the best approach to correct it and
protect the Town's interest, and having the lot built out in the fashion it
was presented to the Board should be part of that process.
D. Steinback, asked if there was a building built and if there is no
occupancy permit yet, is it ready to be occupied yet? C. Berry indicated
yes. So there is a business that wants to start up, move into a new building
and the Board is going to allow this not to happen because we are waiting on
a drainage analysis report.
B. Boyer stated to D. Steinback, that the Board is not responsible for this;
the Board requested this as it was suppose to have been be presented. This
is not the Planning Board fault.
B. Bourdeau state the Board is working with the applicant in trying to
resolve this. The applicant is working with the Board, even in this working
process we still have to make sure it is right.
B. Boyer stated at the last meeting the Board discussed having the applicant
post a bond so an occupancy certificate could be issued as the Board did not
want to hold the applicant up. The Board is working to get this occupancy
certificated and this is what the Board needs.
D. Mott stated he believes the site has been built exactly as the plan
shows. B. Boyer indicated he can not verify that as B. Boyer is not an
engineer.
Hank Soucy, Building Inspector, stated there has been a lot of confusion
with this site. The Town has had three Land Use Clerks and there has been
some confusion about if this plan had been approved or not. The Building
Permit was issued; this came up as a result of a complaint from lot 7, who
had concerns about the drainage from lot 6. H. Soucy strongly suggest the
Board stand firm and make sure that this goes to a Third Party Review
because there has already been some complaint and issues about this lot and
H. Soucy stated he is not an engineer. H. Soucy stated to protect the Town
he would strongly suggest the review.
L. Lessard asked C. Berry if he had any discussion with the applicant
concerning posting a bond. C. Berry indicated he did not. L. Lessard stated
the there was discussion at the December meeting with the applicant, and the
Board made is clear the Board would work with him, but they needed the
applicant to post a bond.
D. Steinbach amended his previous motion to indicate that the Board would
allow the Occupancy Permit as soon as the applicant's Bond is posted as
discussed in the previous minutes of December 18th, 2007.
L. Lessard Seconded the Motion.
The Chair requested to pull all motions from the table.
D. S. rescinded his motions completely.
C. Berry asked what the applicant was posting a bonded for. Are we bonding
for the report, or the infer structure? C. Berry state he was unsure what
the applicant was bonding for.
B. Boyer stated the Board was looking for the drainage report, the Board has
not seen the report. C. Berry asked if a drainage analysis for this site
cost $1500.00 and a review cost $500.00, so the Board is looking for
$2,000.00-$2,500.00 dollars to be posted with the Selectmen for the design
and review of the property.
B. Bourdeau indicated he would like to see extra added in the bond in case
it has not been built out to site. Again, he is going to have the
Certificate Occupancy, not only do we need the report, the Board needs some
kind of value in case it has not been done right. The Selectmen have final
approval; this will have to be justified with the Board of Selectmen.
D. Steinbach asked if the Board needed to come up with a certain amount. L.
Lessard indicated it would be at the discretion of the Board of Selectmen.
D. Steinbach asked when was this plan done. B. Boyer state final approval
was November, 2006. D. Steinbach asked if the Board needed an additional
motion. B. Boyer indicated no addition motion needed at this time.
C. Berry asked if the Drainage Analysis yields a 1% increase or an increase,
what the Board is going to do concerning the issue. Because the applicant
already has an approved site plan. The Board indicated to work with issues
if they should occur.
D. Steinbach said the Board is asking the applicant to take this action and
the Board is allowing an occupancy permit to be issued. B. Boyer agreed, as
long as the applicant has posted a bond before an occupancy permit is
issued.
C. Berry asked when this application would be continue to, what date? The
Chair continued until the next Planning Board Meeting on February 5, 2008.
Susan J. Mummey, Shoreland Permit Application Plan - Map 28 Lot 43 Second
Rd. Milton N.H.
The Chair moved the Mummey property discussion up on the agenda. D. Mott was
there to represent the Mummey's. Dave indicated at the last meeting it was
decided by the Planning Board that all the conditions had been met for the
application and there was no signature block on the plan. D. Mott indicated
he is no longer doing work as Crown Point Surveying & Engineering, and now
doing business as Mott Survey. D. Mott presented the Board with a letter
authorizing Mott Survey to submit the plan to the Board. D. Mott basically
put his border on the plan and has the revised plan with the added signature
block for the Planning Board; he also had smaller copies of the plan. D.
Mott indicated he notice the zoning was incorrect on the previous plan and
corrected the zoning. The letter submitted to the Board references what D.
Mott has completed on the Mummey Plans.
D. Steinbach reference D. Mott work as housing keeping, as the Board needed
the plan accordingly to previous Planning Board Minutes.
Leo Lessard made a motion to accept the plans.
D. Steinbach seconded the motion.
Vote was unanimously
6. Discussion Re: Index Packing, Inc. Site Plan for property located
on 1005 White Mountain Highway, Milton, NH (Map 27 Lot 11) The
Planning Board conditionally approved the Site Plan Applications on
April 4, 2006
The Planning Board conditionally approved the Site Plan Applications on
April 4, 2006. The Land Use Clerk spoke with the applicant concerning
finalizing the condition and the applicant has contacted Norways Plains
Assoc. Charlie Karcher stated Scott was working with Index Packing Inc. and
he would check with Scott on the status.
D. Steinback asked the Chair if the Board needs to see the plan again. The
Chair indicated no, as long as the notes are on the plan the Chair can sign
it. So the plan does not need to go in front of the Board again.
7. Discussion Re: Charles & Dina Farrell 2-lot Minor Subdivision for
property located on Willey Rd. (Map 9 Lot 122)
The Chair verified that all fees had been paid and abutters had been
notified. C. Berry, indicated he was representing the applicant of the
simply 2 lot sub division located on Willey Rd. Mark Jacobs locate the
poorly drained and very poorly drained land area. The ordinance state the
very poorly drainage need to be subtracted from the lot. Both lots are 2
acres lots after you subtract out the very poorly drained land and steep
slopes. Lots are in excess of the 200' of frontage and all the appropriate
set back is shown.
B. Bourdeau asked if lot 122-1 driveway location is going to have the site
distance required by the Town. C. Berry indicated yes, that the location was
actually chosen for the site distance requirement.
Pat Smith, Highway Department requested the driveway marked for inspection.
Police, Fire Department had no issues; Assessing Department verified the Map
and Numbers, Building Inspector and Conservation Committee had no concerns.
D. Steinbach made a Motion to accept application
B. Bourdeau Seconded the Motion
All in Favor - Unanimously
D. Steinbach move to approve the 2 lot subdivision
B. Bourdeau wants to approve subject to the condition of Pat Smith, Highway
Department driveway approval.
B. Boyer, the Board will approve the subdivision subject to Pat Smith,
Highway Department approval of the driveway location
D. Steinbach move to amend his motion to include approval with the condition
of driveway location approval.
B. Bourdeau seconded the motion to approve the 2 lot subdivision
All in Favor - Unanimously
8. Discussion Re: Subdivision of land for
Mark Phillips, Mason Rd - Map 25 Lot 16 request for consideration of a lot
consolidation
B. Boyer explained that the Board is reviewing an
approved subdivision, now the applicant would like to remove 2 lot lines to
create a larger lot before the Board signs the Mylar.
C. Karcher presented to the Board a revised plan
to the original plan first submitted to the Board. The revised plan shows
the removal of lot lines, creating a larger lot to the plan and removing 2
lots as shown the first plan.
D. Steinbach asked what the 2 lot numbers that are
being affected are. C. Karcher indicated Map 25-Lot16-6 and Map 25-Lot 16-2
are removed from the plan.
B. White asked if the lots are going to be
renumbered. C Karcher stated it has already been done.
B. Boyer asked if the Board approves the amended
subdivision.
B. White moved to approve the amended subdivision.
L. Lessard seconded the motion.
The Chair asked if there was any discussion.
Closed discussion
All in Favor - Unanimously
9. Discussion Re: Use of Site Identification Card on application
sites.
The Board has requested the Land Use Clerk to research Site Identification
Cards, when Public
Hearing was held, is it in the Site Plan Regulations. B. Bourdeau mention
contacting Michelle Beauchamp to help with researching information
concerning the Site Identification Card. The Board agreed to continue
discussion to the next Planning Board Meeting.
10. Discussion Re: NH Estuaries Project
Accepting Applications for 2008 Projects
The Chair reviewed the letter with the Board. L.
Lessard suggested if any Board member wanted to review the letter to obtain
a copy at the Town Office. B. White suggested if a member wanted to do
something with the application a workshop could be held. D. Steinbach
indicated he feels it should be passed on to the Conservation Committee and
Milton 3 Pond Protection Association. B. White indicated this could be a
workshop for Conservation and the Planning Board.
11. Discussion Re: NHDES Approval for
Construction
Agenda Items 11-14 NHDES Approval for Construction
are non-agenda items. Board's review not needed.
15. Discussion Re: NHDES Wetlands File
#2005-2859, Three Ponds Investment, LLC Bolan Rd. & Northeast Pond Rd.
Milton Tax Map 23 Lot 44 & Lot 149.
The Chair read letter to the Board. The Wetlands
Application #2005-2859 had been denied.
16. Discussion Re: NHDES Approval for
Subdivision
Agenda Items 16 - 18 NHDES Approvals are non -
agenda items. Board's review not needed.
B. White requested that the items that do not need
to be discussed or put on the agenda be stated in the minutes. The Chair
indicated the letters are notice of approval of construction, septic system,
and operations, they should go to the Health/Building Inspector.
Hank Soucy stated a letter would be going out to
DES concerning this.
19. Discussion Re: Strafford Regional
Planning Commission - Changes in the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act.
The Chair stated these changes will be effective
April 1, 2008. The Chair indicate this was confusing and they are changes a
lot of thing. C. Karcher state there is two more seminars, one in February
and one in March.
The Chair stated a seminar is being held on
February 7, 2008 at 7:00 pm at the Dover City Hall Council Chamber.
Charlie Karcher said there are a lot of items that
will need to be clarified with this new plan. D. Steinbach agreed, Dan
stated there is a lot of loose end that need to be tied up.
The Chair state the last day for public comment to
the Commission is January 28th, 2008 and they will have a revised schedule
out February 4th, 2008.
20. Discussion Re: Strafford Regional
Planning Commission - Overdue Invoices for Town of Milton Subdivision
Reviews.
The Board has requested the Land Use Clerk to
review all invoices and bill applicants with any outstanding cost if needed.
D. Steinbach asked what the total bill from SRPC
was. B. Boyer indicated $l,530.00. D. Steinbach asked if it was in the
budget. B. White indicated it was not. B. White agrees to bill the
developers and engineers as they were aware they would be billed for the
cost incurred from 3rd party billing. B. Boyer indicated some 3rd party
reviews that the applicants were never billed.
21. Discussion Re: NHDES Alteration of
Terrain Application - Diamond Heart Properties - McKeagney Rd. - Map 45 Lot
16
Review by the Board, Duly Noted.
22. Discussion Re: NHDOT copy of Final
Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary and the Socio-Economic
Excerpts of the FEIS for the Newington-Dover 11238NHS-027-1(37) Project.
Summary of the Strafford Turnpike improvements.
Review by the Board and Duly Noted.
23. Discussion Re: Memo from Recreation
Director, Christine Collins - Re: Scheduling at Town Offices and Emma Ramsey
Community Center.
Dates for the 2008 Planning Board Meetings have been submitted to Christine
Collins.
24. Other Business:
A. Correspondence from the
Assessing Clerk
The Land Use Clerk has included the Assessing Department on the Land Use
Review Form, and the Assessing Department will receive a copy of the
application for review, at which time they can make adjustments for map and
lot numbers if needed.
C. Heart & Soul Community Planning
Email from Bruce Woodruff
Chair read an email concerning a small foundation
that helps small towns in New England to develop and plan for future growth
inspired by their community's heart and soul. If any member wants to review
the email, a copy may be obtained from the Land Use Clerk. The email has
telephone numbers, email addresses and a web site on it.
The Chair brought up the discussion of Impact
Fees? B. Bourdeau said he had spoke with Bruce Woodruff concerning this
issue and B. Woodruff indicated it was not complete at this time. The Chair
indicated the Board needed to send B. Woodruff a letter, it is important to
have this in place as soon as possible. B. Bourdeau stated once development
starts again, this will be critical.
B. White stated anything at this point the Board
wants update on regulations, ordinances, this is a good time to get thing up
to date.
B. White asked the Land Use Clerk if any work had
been done on fees. At this time nothing had been done. The Clerk will be
contacting area towns for verify their fees and will be working on a
comparison, so the fees will be in line with other towns.
B. Bourdeau, inquired on the status of Mike Smith,
and attendance on the Board. The members discussed the seat on the Board.
The Board requested the Land Use Clerk to contact M. Smith concerning his
seat on the Planning Board.
Larry Brown came into the meeting 8:15 PM.
Dan Steinbach asked the Chair is there was
anything addition concerning the signs that are in the Town and does not
meet the signs ordinances. D. Steinbach understands that the Building
Inspector has been removing the signs. D. Steinbach would like the Board to
encourage the Board of Selectmen, and the Building Inspector to do anything
they can to stop these A1 Firewood signs from going up in the Town. If this
means the Town takes the man to court, let's do it. D. Steinbach suggested
contacting other Towns dealing with this issue and see if they want to
participate in this.
B. Boyer indicated we do have a sign ordinance,
and to issue a citation you need to go to District Court. D. Steinbach asked
what the procedure was. B. Boyer stated you need to get a cease and decease
out, and then you need to take them to court.
Hank Soucy indicated he has talked with
surrounding towns and discussed with the town what steps they were taking.
D. Steinbach moves to ask the Selectmen to enforce
sign ordinance by fining this specific individual for his signs that are
illegally place in our Town.
Leo Lessard seconded the motion.
All in Favor - 3 yes and 2 no by B. White and B.
Bourdeau
25. Adjournment
B. Bourdeau made a motion to adjourn the meeting
at 8:25 P.M.
Brian Boyers
Planning Board Chair
Respectfully submitted,
Kathy Wallingford |
